redundante.net

Al hilo de la entrada anterior, me topo con otra “inicitiva 2.0″: Startup 2.0. Lo definen como: “(…) the first social network exclusively for startups”. Todavía está en desarrollo pero supongo que lanzarán en breve… antes de que se pase la fiebre.

La pregunta es: ¿y todos estos 2.0 encajan aquí?:

Me reconozco fan de Tim y no-fan de Tim.

El primero de los 2 (Berners-Lee), de todo ésto, piensa ésto:

LANINGHAM: You know, with Web 2.0, a common explanation out there is Web 1.0 was about connecting computers and making information available; and Web 2 is about connecting people and facilitating new kinds of collaboration. Is that how you see Web 2.0?

BERNERS-LEE: Totally not. Web 1.0 was all about connecting people. It was an interactive space, and I think Web 2.0 is of course a piece of jargon, nobody even knows what it means. If Web 2.0 for you is blogs and wikis, then that is people to people. But that was what the Web was supposed to be all along.

And in fact, you know, this Web 2.0, quote, it means using the standards which have been produced by all these people working on Web 1.0. It means using the document object model, it means for HTML and SVG and so on, it’s using HTTP, so it’s building stuff using the Web standards, plus Java script of course.

So Web 2.0 for some people it means moving some of the thinking client side so making it more immediate, but the idea of the Web as interaction between people is really what the Web is. That was what it was designed to be as a collaborative space where people can interact.

El caso es que todo esto del 2.0 nos recuerda experiencias pasadas. ¿Para bien o para mal?.

Ni idea pero, en cualquier caso, cuidadín con los falsos profetas.